I Do or Please Dont Hawaiis Same Sex Marria Essay Example For Students

I Do or Please Dont: Hawaiis Same Sex Marria Essay I Do or Please Dont: Hawaiis Same Sex Marriages With the recent decision by the Hawaii courts regarding the legalization of marriage between same-sex couples, a political debate across the United States has begun. Many people believe that this is a monstrous step to legalizing same-sex unions country wide, especially since legal tradition recognizes marriages performed in other states as binding within every other state, but also because Hawaii is known for its liberal, ground-breaking first steps that the other states often follow the model of. If the states have any will, however, they will not fold to the pressure put on them by this state and the gay rights groups, they will continue to not recognize a man and man or a woman and woman as a man and wife. What is marriage anyway? Isnt it the union of two people who love each other to prove their commitments to one another for the future? Yes, but there is more. Websters Dictionary defines marriage as: a) the state of being joined together as husband and wife, b) the state of joining a man to a woman as her husband or a woman to a man as his wife. Legally, however, marriage is more than just a statement of love. Marriage comes with economic and legal benefits that one cannot receive alone. For example, joint parental custody, insurance and health benefits, the ability to file joint tax returns, alimony and child support, and inheritance of property and visitation of a partner or a child in the hospital. In fact, the Hawaii Commission on Sexual Orientation itself concluded that denial of marriage licenses to same-sex couples deprived applicants of these legal and economic benefits. So, are homosexuals fighting for the right of marriage to state their love as the gay rights groups suggest or are they pushing for the right of marriage because of the many benefits that come with it? The answer is obvious they are fighting for the benefits that come along with marriage. If they were fighting for love, then where would we stop these feelings? If homosexuals were allowed to marry because they love each other and they consent, then couldnt a pedophile marry a younger child as long as both parties fully consented? If homosexuals were allowed to marry because they love each other, then couldnt one man marry many wives because he loved each one and they each loved him? If homosexuals were allowed to marry because they love each other, then couldnt a son and his mother, or even a brother and a brother, marry because they love each other? As one member of the Episcopal Laity Group said, a line must be drawn and it must never be crossed. Marriage is for a man and a woman, and thats the way marriage will always be. The gay rights activists claim that this denial of love, in the form of marriage, is a form of discrimination. These gay rights activists claim that this denial of love is similar to when slavery was being defended, womens voting rights were being denied, or even more specifically and more related, the anti-miscegenation laws of a few decades back. This is clearly an attempt at tugging at the nations heart chords by comparing the struggle for same-sex unions to several notable, if not the most notable, equality struggles in the history of the United States. The comparison to the defense of slavery or the denial of womens voting rights by gay rights groups is simply unfounded. Homosexuality has never been considered morally good, and it is a tremendous jump from saying that black-skinned people should work for white-skinned people just because of skin color or women cant vote just because of sex to saying that homosexuals cant marry just because of their sexual habits. .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 , .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .postImageUrl , .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 , .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4:hover , .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4:visited , .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4:active { border:0!important; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4:active , .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4 .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u123b5d381875adcf0303af120b2504b4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Why Did the Polls Get it Wrong in 1992? Essay Thesis There is a clear distinction. First of all, Colin Powell once noted that skin color (and gender in this case) and sexual behavior are completely different and incomparable. Skin color and gender are born into, and they have absolutely no effect on conduct or character, sexual behavior on the other hand, has everything to do with character, morality, and societys basic rules of conduct. If anything, homosexuality is comparable to smokers, compulsive gamblers, pornography fanatics, sex addicts, and pedophiles because these are all people whose traits (whether inborn or not) directly effect society. This also directly relates to interracial marriages because a persons skin color does not produce a certain effect on conduct or character. .